<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mama, don&#8217;t let your babies name their books with garden path noun compounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/2009/07/mama-dont-let-your-babies-name-their-books-with-garden-path-noun-compounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/2009/07/mama-dont-let-your-babies-name-their-books-with-garden-path-noun-compounds/</link>
	<description>A blog about Search User Interfaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:06:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/2009/07/mama-dont-let-your-babies-name-their-books-with-garden-path-noun-compounds/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/?p=83#comment-45</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This surprised me because everyone uses search on the web, although I guess they call it “googling” (a term I never use outside of scare quotes) rather than “searching” or “web searching” or “using web search engines”. &lt;/i&gt;

Not to mention the fact that Google only does one of many possible types of search: Precision-oriented search.  No recall-oriented options are available, no exporatory search is available.  It&#039;s much better to use the term &quot;searching&quot;; it&#039;s much broader than &quot;googling&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This surprised me because everyone uses search on the web, although I guess they call it “googling” (a term I never use outside of scare quotes) rather than “searching” or “web searching” or “using web search engines”. </i></p>
<p>Not to mention the fact that Google only does one of many possible types of search: Precision-oriented search.  No recall-oriented options are available, no exporatory search is available.  It&#8217;s much better to use the term &#8220;searching&#8221;; it&#8217;s much broader than &#8220;googling&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marti</title>
		<link>http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/2009/07/mama-dont-let-your-babies-name-their-books-with-garden-path-noun-compounds/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/?p=83#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing, Tony.  Yes, I did consider that but I did like the pithiness of SUI.  Really I didn&#039;t seriously consider anything else.  And I agree that my target audience will understand the name as is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing, Tony.  Yes, I did consider that but I did like the pithiness of SUI.  Really I didn&#8217;t seriously consider anything else.  And I agree that my target audience will understand the name as is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Russell-Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/2009/07/mama-dont-let-your-babies-name-their-books-with-garden-path-noun-compounds/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Russell-Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchuserinterfaces.com/blog/?p=83#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hi Marti,

Bit of an obvious suggestion maybe, but did you consider &quot;user interfaces for search&quot;? You could then arbitrarily add other qualifiers , e.g. &quot;... and information access&quot;, or suchlike. But it is longer and perhaps not quite as pithy.

BTW, I suspect your &#039;typical&#039; readers will probably not even be conscious of the alternative interpretation(s) - that is one of the saving graces of garden path sentences!

Cheers,
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marti,</p>
<p>Bit of an obvious suggestion maybe, but did you consider &#8220;user interfaces for search&#8221;? You could then arbitrarily add other qualifiers , e.g. &#8220;&#8230; and information access&#8221;, or suchlike. But it is longer and perhaps not quite as pithy.</p>
<p>BTW, I suspect your &#8216;typical&#8217; readers will probably not even be conscious of the alternative interpretation(s) &#8211; that is one of the saving graces of garden path sentences!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
